Overview
Mental health providers need objective, continuous monitoring of depression symptoms between clinical visits, but patient self-reporting is inconsistent, subjective, and fails to capture subtle changes in physiological and behavioral patterns that signal symptom progression or treatment response.
The Openwater Depression Symptom Tracking model uses OpenMOTION optical imaging combined with wearable sensors to provide clinicians with objective, quantitative measures of depression-related biomarkers including sleep patterns, heart rate variability, activity levels, and autonomic nervous system function.
Clinical Need
Current depression monitoring relies heavily on subjective patient reporting with significant limitations:
- Recall Bias: Patients struggle to accurately remember symptom severity over 2-4 week intervals
- Reporting Inconsistency: Self-reported symptoms vary based on current mood, not actual trends
- Treatment Lag: Medication adjustments typically delayed 6-8 weeks due to insufficient data
- Missing Early Signals: Physiological changes precede subjective awareness by 1-2 weeks
- Limited Visit Time: 15-minute appointments insufficient for comprehensive symptom assessment
- Relapse Detection: Subtle relapse warning signs often missed between visits
Clinical Procedure
The OpenMOTION-based monitoring system provides continuous tracking of depression-related biomarkers with minimal patient burden:
Initial Clinical Assessment & Baseline
Patient completes standard depression assessment (PHQ-9, GAD-7) and receives wearable sensor (wristband). Clinician configures monitoring parameters based on patient history and current medications. Baseline data collection: 7 days.
Continuous Passive Monitoring
Patient wears sensor continuously (except during charging). System automatically tracks sleep patterns, heart rate variability, activity levels, circadian rhythm stability, and autonomic balance. No active patient input required beyond wearing device.
Weekly Check-ins & Data Review
Patient completes brief weekly symptom survey (2 minutes) via mobile app. System generates weekly report showing objective biomarker trends alongside subjective reports. Clinician reviews dashboard for concerning patterns.
Automated Alerts & Early Intervention
Machine learning algorithms detect significant deviations from patient's baseline (e.g., sustained HRV decline, sleep fragmentation increase). Automated alerts notify clinician of potential symptom worsening 1-2 weeks before patient would typically report decline.
Data-Informed Clinical Decisions
At scheduled visits (or urgent check-ins if alerted), clinician reviews comprehensive biomarker data alongside traditional assessments. Treatment adjustments made based on objective physiological patterns, not just subjective reports. Response to interventions tracked quantitatively.
Technical Implementation
Monitored Biomarkers
- Sleep Architecture: Total sleep time, sleep onset latency, wake after sleep onset, REM/deep sleep percentage
- Heart Rate Variability (HRV): RMSSD, SDNN, LF/HF ratio—indicators of autonomic nervous system balance
- Activity Patterns: Daily step count, sedentary time, activity variability, circadian rhythm consistency
- Resting Heart Rate: Nighttime and daytime averages, trend analysis
- Circadian Alignment: Sleep-wake timing consistency, exposure to light/darkness patterns
- Social Interaction Proxy: Phone usage patterns, physical proximity to others (with consent)
Machine Learning Models
- Personalized Baseline: First 2-4 weeks establish individual patient's "healthy" baseline patterns
- Anomaly Detection: Identifies statistically significant deviations from baseline (≥1.5 SD sustained for 3+ days)
- Symptom Prediction: Predicts PHQ-9 score based on objective biomarkers (R² = 0.65-0.75 in validation studies)
- Treatment Response: Quantifies biomarker improvements following medication changes or therapy
- Relapse Warning: Flags early relapse signatures 10-14 days before subjective awareness
Clinical Integration
- EHR Integration: HL7 FHIR-compliant data export to Epic, Cerner, other major systems
- Clinician Dashboard: Web-based interface showing patient panel overview and individual trends
- Patient Mobile App: Weekly check-ins, data transparency, medication reminders
- Automated Reporting: Weekly summary reports generated for clinical team review
Implementation Roadmap
Phase 1: Clinician Validation & Feature Definition (Months 1-6)
Objective: Define core biomarker set and validate clinical decision-making utility with mental health providers.
- Interview 20+ psychiatrists, psychologists, and mental health clinicians
- Review depression treatment guidelines and literature on objective biomarkers
- Conduct focus groups to identify most clinically actionable metrics
- Map clinician workflow to determine optimal data presentation format
- Define alert thresholds and clinical decision support requirements
- Establish privacy and consent frameworks acceptable to clinicians and patients
Phase 2: Algorithm Development & Technical Validation (Months 7-14)
Objective: Develop machine learning algorithms and validate against existing depression datasets.
- Acquire or partner for access to existing wearable + PHQ-9 datasets (n=500+)
- Develop personalized baseline algorithms and anomaly detection models
- Train symptom prediction models (objective biomarkers → PHQ-9 score)
- Validate algorithm performance: sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value
- Build clinician dashboard prototype with sample patient data
- Conduct usability testing with 10 clinicians using simulated patient cases
Phase 3: Clinical Pilot Study (Months 15-24)
Objective: Deploy with 100 depression patients across 5-10 mental health providers for real-world validation.
- Recruit patients beginning antidepressant treatment or switching medications
- Patients wear sensor continuously for 16 weeks (typical medication titration period)
- Collect standard clinical assessments (PHQ-9, GAD-7) every 2 weeks
- Clinicians review biomarker dashboard before each patient visit
- Measure primary outcomes: time to treatment optimization, symptom remission rate
- Assess secondary outcomes: patient satisfaction, clinician workflow integration
- Document adverse events, data quality issues, technical failures
Phase 4: Multi-Site Effectiveness Study (Months 25-36)
Objective: Expand to 500+ patients across diverse clinical settings to demonstrate clinical effectiveness.
- Deploy across university psychiatry clinics, community mental health centers, private practices
- Randomized controlled design: standard care vs. biomarker-augmented care
- Primary endpoint: remission rate at 12 weeks (PHQ-9 <5)
- Secondary endpoints: time to remission, treatment optimization speed, relapse rate
- Health economics analysis: cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY)
- Publish results and pursue FDA clearance for depression monitoring indication
Expected Outcomes
Clinical Outcomes
- 30% increase in remission rate at 12 weeks (from ~40% to ~52% with biomarker guidance)
- 4-6 weeks faster time to optimal treatment (from 12-16 weeks to 6-10 weeks)
- 50% reduction in relapse within 6 months through early detection
- Improved medication adherence through objective feedback on treatment progress
Patient Experience Outcomes
- Reduced appointment frequency enabled by continuous monitoring (less travel burden)
- Empowerment through data transparency—patients see objective progress
- Earlier intervention when symptoms worsen, reducing crisis episodes
- Better communication with providers through shared objective data
Health System Outcomes
- Reduced emergency department visits and hospitalizations from missed relapses
- More efficient medication management—fewer trial-and-error cycles
- Scalable monitoring for clinician panels of 100+ patients
- Data infrastructure for precision psychiatry and treatment matching
Get Involved
We're seeking partners to advance objective depression monitoring and precision mental health care:
- Mental Health Clinicians: Clinical validation partners and protocol co-design
- Academic Medical Centers: Research partnership for effectiveness studies
- Digital Health Researchers: Algorithm development and validation collaborators
- EHR Vendors: Integration partners for clinical workflow embedding
- Patient Advocacy Groups: Input on privacy, consent, and patient experience
- Funders: Support for clinical trials and technology development